Secured MCU Breaker Experts!

Archive for the ‘Break IC’ Category

Brute Force IC Break is a process through which the inner circuitry pattern of MCU will be changed include decapsulation, focus ion beam and laser cut ways;

Brute force IC break’s one good example could be the password protection scheme used in microcontrollers, such as the Texas Instruments MSP430 family. The password itself is 32 bytes (256 bits) long which is more than enough to withstand direct brute force MCU breaking methods.

Brute Force IC Break is a process through which the inner circuitry pattern of MCU will be changed include decapsulation, focus ion beam and laser cut ways

But the password is allocated at the same memory addresses as the CPU interrupt vectors. That, firstly, reduces the area of search as the vectors always point to even addresses within memory. Secondly, when the software gets updated, only a small part of the password is changed because most of the interrupt subroutines pointed to by the vectors are very likely to stay at the same addresses.

As a result, if the IC code extractor knows one of the previous passwords he could easily do a systematic search and find the correct password in a reasonable time.

Brute Force Chip Attack include invasive and semi-invasive microcontroller cracking, hardware attacking will be able to get access to embedded memory such as flash and eeprom memory, then readout firmware from Microprocessor memory;

Brute Force Chip Attack include invasive and semi-invasive microcontroller cracking, hardware attacking will be able to get access to embedded memory such as flash and eeprom memory, then readout firmware from Microprocessor memory

MCU Attack has different meanings for cryptography and semiconductor hardware. In cryptography, a brute force chip attack would be defined as the methodical application of a large set of trials for a key to the system. This is usually done with a computer or an array of FPGAs delivering patterns at high speed and looking for success.

We can decrypt IC ATMEGA640P secured code, please view the IC ATMEGA640P features for your reference:
Digital circuitry inside and outside the ATmega640P generates EMI, which might affect the accuracy of analog measurements. If conversion accuracy is critical, the noise level can be reduced by applying the following techniques:
1. The analog part of the ATmega640P and all analog components in the application should have a separate analog ground plane on the PCB. This ground plane is connected to the digital ground plane via a single point on the PCB.
2. Keep analog signal paths as short as possible. Make sure analog tracks run over the analog ground plane, and keep them well away from high-speed switching digital tracks before Decrypt IC ATmega640P Secured Code.
3. Use the ADC noise canceler function to reduce induced noise from the CPU.
4. If some Port B pins are used as digital outputs, it is essential that these do not switch while a conversion is in progress.
All AVR ports have true read-modify-write functionality when used as general digital I/O ports. This means that the direction of one port pin can be changed without unintentionally changing the direction of any other pin with the SBI and CBI instructions.
The same applies for changing drive value (if configured as output) or enabling/disabling of pull-up resistors (if configured as input). Port B is a 6-bit bi-directional I/O port when Decrypt IC ATmega640P Secured Code.
Three data memory address locations are allocated for Port B, one each for the Data Register – PORTB, $18, Data Direction Register – DDRB, $17, and the Port B Input Pins – PINB, $16. The Port B Input Pins address is read-only, while the Data Register and the Data Direction Register are read/write.
Ports PB5..0 have special functions as described in the section “Pin Descriptions” on page 4. If PB5 is not configured as external reset, it is input with no pull-up or as an open-drain output.
All I/O pins have individually selectable pull-ups, which can be over- ridden with pull-up disable. The Port B output buffers on PB0 to PB4 can sink 20 mA and thus drive LED displays directly before decrypt IC secured code.
PB5 can sink 12 mA. When pins PB0 to PB4 are used as inputs and are externally pulled low, they will source current (IIL) if the internal pull-ups are activated after BREAK IC.

To prevent MCU timing attacks, the designer should carefully calculate the number of CPU cycles that take place when the password is compared and make sure they are the same for correct and incorrect passwords. For example, in the Motorola 68HC08 microcontrollers family the internal ROM bootloader allows access to the Flash memory only if the correct eight-byte password was entered first.

To achieve that, extra NOP commands were added to the program making the processing time equal for both correct and incorrect bytes of the password. That gives good protection against MCU timing attacks. Some microcontrollers have an internal RC generator mode of operation in which the CPU running frequency depends upon the power supply voltage and the die temperature which will greatly increase the difficulty of MCU cracking.

This makes timing analysis more difficult as the MCU attacker has to stabilize the device temperature and reduce any fluctuations and noise on the power supply line. Some smartcards have an internally randomised clock signal to make measurements of the time delays useless for the attack.

Timing attacks can be applied to microcontrollers whose security protection is based on passwords, or to access control systems that use cards or keys with fixed serial numbers, for example, Dallas iButton products. The common mistake in such systems is the way the serial number of the entered key is verified against the database. Very often the system checks each byte of the key against one entry in the database and stops as soon as an incorrect byte is found. Then it switches to the next entry in the database until it reaches the end. So the attacker can easily measure the time between the input of the last key and the request for another key and figure out how many coincidences were found. With a relatively small number of attempts, he will be able to find one of the matching keys.

We can break IC ATMEGA640A secured flash, please view the IC ATMEGA640A features for your reference:
If differential channels are selected, the differential gain stage amplifies the voltage difference between the selected input pair by the selected gain factor, 1x or 20x, according to the setting of the MUX2..0 bits in ADMUX..
This amplified value then becomes the analog input to the ADC. If single-ended channels are used, the gain amplifier is bypassed altogether.
If ADC2 is selected as both the positive and negative input to the differential gain amplifier (ADC2 – ADC2), the remaining offset in the gain stage and conversion circuitry can be measured directly as the result of the conversion before Break IC ATmega640A Secured Flash.
This figure can be subtracted from subsequent conversions with the same gain setting to reduce offset error to below 1 LSB. The ADC can operate in two modes – Single Conversion and Free Running after break IC secured flash.
In Single Conversion mode, each conversion will have to be initiated by the user. In Free Running mode, the ADC is constantly sampling and updating the ADC Data Register. The ADFR bit in ADCSR selects between the two available modes when Break IC ATmega640A Secured Flash.
The ADC is enabled by setting the ADC Enable bit, ADEN in ADCSR. Voltage reference and input channel selections will not go into effect until ADEN is set. The ADC does not consume power when ADEN is cleared, so it is recommended to switch off the ADC before entering Power-saving sleep modes if break IC secured flash.
A conversion is started by writing a logical “1” to the ADC Start Conversion bit, ADSC. This bit stays high as long as the conversion is in progress and will be set to zero by hardware when the conversion is completed.
If a different data channel is selected while a conversion is in progress, the ADC will finish the current conversion before performing the channel change.
The ADC generates a 10-bit result, which is presented in the ADC data registers, ADCH and ADCL. By default, the result is presented right-adjusted, but can optionally be presented left-adjusted by setting the ADLAR bit in ADMUX after BREAK IC.

To prevent Timing IC attack the techniques used for blinding signatures can be used. The general idea is to prevent the attacker knowing the input to the modular exponentiation operation by mixing the input with a chosen random value.

To conduct the attack one needs to collect a set of messages, together with their processing time, e.g. question-answer delay. Many cryptographic algorithms were found to be vulnerable to timing attacks. The main reason why this happens is in the software implementation of each algorithm. That includes performance optimisation to bypass unnecessary branching and conditional operations, cache memory usage, non-fixed time processor instructions such as multiplication and division, and a wide variety of other causes. As a result performance characteristics typically depend on both the encryption key and the input data.

We can break secured mcu ATMEGA88PA program, please view the secured mcu ATMEGA88PA features for your reference:
When writing serial data to the ATtiny15L, data is clocked on the rising edge of SCK. When reading data from the ATtiny15L, data is clocked on the falling edge of SCK. See Figure 34, Figure 35, and Table 28 for timing details.
To program and verify the ATtiny15L in the Serial Programming mode, the following sequence is recommended (See 4-byte instruction formats in Table 27):
Power-up sequence:
Apply power between VCC and GND while RESET and SCK are set to “0 ”. If the programmer cannot guarantee that SCK is held low during Power-up, RESET must be given a positive pulse of at least two MCU cycles duration after SCK has been set to “0” if Break Secured MCU ATmega88PA Program.
Wait for at least 20 ms and enable serial programming by sending the Programming Enable serial instruction to the MOSI (PB0) pin. Refer to the above section for minimum low and high periods for the serial clock input SCK.
The serial programming instructions will not work if the communication is out of synchronization. When in sync, the second byte ($53) will echo back when issuing the third byte of the Programming Enable instruction.
Whether the echo is correct or not, all four bytes of the instruction must be transmitted. If the $53 did not echo back, give SCK a positive pulse and issue a new Programming Enable instruction. If the $53 is not seen within 32 attempts, there is no functional device connected when Break Secured MCU ATmega88PA Program.
If a Chip Erase is performed (must be done to erase the Flash), wait tWD_ERASE after the instruction, give RESET a positive pulse, and start over from step 2. See Table 29 on page 63 for tWD_ERASE value.

The Flash or program array is programmed one byte at a time by supplying the address and data together with the appropriate write instruction. An program memory location is first automatically erased before new data is written. Use data polling to detect when the next byte in the Flash or program can be written before Break Secured MCU ATmega88PA Program.
If polling is not used, wait tWD_PROG_FL or tWD_PROG_EE, respectively, before transmitting the next instruction. See Table 30 on page 63 for the tWD_PROG_FL and tWD_PROG_EE values. In an erased device, no $FFs in the data file(s) need to be programmed after BREAK IC.

Any memory location can be verified by using the Read instruction, which returns the content at the selected address at the serial output MISO (PB1) pin.
At the end of the programming session, RESET can be set high to commence normal operation.
Power-off sequence (if needed):
Set RESET to “1”.
Turn VCC power off.

Some security-related operations a semiconductor chip performs can take a different time to compete depending on the values of the input data and the secret key. Careful timing measurement and analysis may allow recovery of the system’s secret key. This idea was first published in the scientific literature in 1996. Then later these attacks were successfully performed on an actual smartcard implementation of the RSA signature.